An elder protection organisation has intervened in an ongoing Morris County civil case, asking the court to take urgent steps in what it describes as a serious instance of alleged financial exploitation involving a vulnerable elderly car collector.
Elder Help Network has submitted a motion to appear as amicus curiae in the case of Kerekes v. Polyak (Docket No. MRS L 000015-26), currently before the Morris County Superior Court. The filing supports plaintiff Robert Kerekes, a 90-year-old stroke survivor known for his interest in classic and performance vehicles, and urges the court to consider enhanced protections due to his age and medical condition.
EV conversion project at the centre of dispute
The case arises from a disputed electric vehicle conversion involving Kerekes’ 2003 Acura NSX. According to the amicus filing, mechanic Samuel Polyak is alleged to have substituted the agreed Tesla battery system with used Chevrolet Bolt battery packs sourced from salvage inventory.
The submission argues that these replacement components have been subject to safety concerns in other contexts, including recalls and fire-risk-related settlements, and claims their installation may have exposed the vehicle owner to unnecessary danger.
David Gutwill is also referenced in relation to the broader allegations outlined in the court papers.
Court order and alleged missing vehicle components
The filing states that a Writ of Replevin issued by the court on 14 April 2026 required the return of the vehicle along with all parts. However, it alleges that when the Acura NSX was returned, it was missing key components including the engine, transmission, and other mechanical parts valued at approximately $200,000.
Evidence referenced in the brief includes a statement from Matt Pekham of Vintage Motor Management, who is expected to testify that individuals associated with the defendants had previously acknowledged possession of all relevant parts prior to the vehicle’s return.
The filing also notes what it describes as inconsistent explanations from the defendants, including shifting claims about whether the parts were received or later disposed of.
Elder abuse concerns raised
Elder Help Network argues that the situation meets the threshold for elder financial exploitation under New Jersey’s Adult Protective Services laws. It emphasises that Kerekes’ age and health history, including recovery from a stroke, place him in a particularly vulnerable position in contractual and legal disputes.
The organisation further points to alleged delays in the proceedings, including a rejected bankruptcy filing and non-compliance with court orders, which it says have hindered resolution and recovery of property.
Requests made to the court
In correspondence addressed to Civil Presiding Judge Frank J. DeAngelis, the group is asking for immediate enforcement of the existing Writ of Replevin. It also requests subpoenas compelling testimony and documentation from Samuel Polyak, David Gutwill, and defence counsel Mr. Yuniver.
In addition, the filing asks the court to consider referring the matter to the Morris County Prosecutor’s Office for possible investigation into alleged theft, conversion, and exploitation-related offences.
Organisation’s position
The amicus brief states that the organisation’s role is intended to assist the court by providing expertise on elder protection issues, while remaining neutral on the underlying commercial dispute. It says its involvement is focused on ensuring vulnerable adults are adequately safeguarded within civil proceedings.
The court has not yet ruled on the amicus application or the relief sought in the filing.
